See my bracketed edits and comments below:

. . .

A minute later, the violinist received his first dollar tip: a woman threw the money in the till and without stopping continued to walk. A few minutes later, someone leaned against the wall to listen to him, but the man looked at his watch and started to walk again;[replaced the comma w/ a semicolon] clearly he was late for work.

The one who paid the most attention was a three-year-old[hyphens for a compound adjective; 3 changed since it is a one-syllable number with no surrounding double-digits] boy. His mother tugged him along, but the kid stopped to look at the violinist. Finally the mother pushed hard[comma] and the child continued to walk[add comma] turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children. All the parents, without exception, forced them to move on.

. . .

Two days before his playing in the subway, Joshua Bell sold out at a theater in Boston[add comma] and the seats averaged $100. This is a real story. Joshua Bell playing incognito in the metro station was organized by the[The] Washington Post [and italicize all three words] as part of an[a] social experiment about perception, taste and priorities of people. The outlines["outlines" here is awkward diction; how about "primary questions" asked were these: in[In] a commonplace environment at an inappropriate hour:[use a comma instead of that colon] Do[do] we perceive beauty? Do we stop to appreciate it? Do we recognize the talent in an unexpected context? One of the possible conclusions from this experience could be: If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world playing the best music ever written on an almost priceless instrument, how many other things are we missing?

[Outstanding! I would like to pass the revision on -- with your approval -- to my Interpersonal Communication class at City University of Seattle, and I would love you to hire me as one of your proofreaders.]

Respectfully,

Geoff M. Pope
S E A T T L E
206.354.3233
a close friend of Dan Johnson

I have been amazed by Mike’s productivity and ability to do so much with so little. God has greatly blessed Mike and I have been blessed myself to have Mike in my life.

Keep up the great work!

Micky Thompson

Great post! It’s good to see you giving GTD some love. The principles are great but as an objective observer, I’d say the biggest secret to your success is quality of the people working in your organization. You are all top flight!

A. Pace

Blessings,
Mary Ann

Master that and I’ll give you the next lesson I learned about dicipline. It’s not easy for us “all in” types but it is possible to learn some new techniques that will change our life. I think it will take the rest of my journey to master but it sure has been worth the investment so far.

I look forward to hearing about your progress.

Mike

Wonderful insights – challenging as well to “be” instead of “do” when communicating with the Lord. You mentioned near the end of the article resources you began using to develop a more disciplined life. Do you have a list of resources posted someplace and/or some practical suggestions for daily living? I’m more of the “all or nothing” type and I really need to come to a place of balance and discipline in my relationship with God and others.

Thank you for your heart and you willingness to put it out there for us to see.

Blessings,

Penny Howard

So go mac. And oh yes, You can make your mac into a pc with bootcamp or parallels. if you absolutely need to This has happened time and again as I am reviewing software.

I’ll also add, our home and our office is divided. Hubby and his business is strictly PC, I am strictly MAC. AN office and a marriage can survive such things, as long as their is mutual respect and the computer “jabs” are kept to a minimum. One thing I have noticed if something is not working correctly someone will say, “it is probably a mac thing” As if that is some cop out to keep from really addressing the issue. I stand my ground MAC is Great!

This is an attempt to execute an instruction that does not exist in the CPUÕs repertoire (Unimplemented instruction error). Lack of support for the machine on which it is being run (for example, a 68020 instruction execution attempt on a 68000).

LOL!!! Sorry.. Couldn’t resist!!